This week was a stressful but
successful week. I say this because I was able to finish my project for the ASU
conference which is only a week away! But I have to say it
was tricky trying to get all my information neatly organized. Plugging the
information was the easy part of this project, but making it
all fit took so long. Playing with the colors, font, font size,
and all the effects kept me entertained for a while. I was able to
finish this over the weekend and on Monday when I came in Matt nicely went over
it and gave me some feedback. I was able to change a few things to
make it better and even though I personally like the pink color I
originally chose that looked cute, I changed it to a lighter
pink because the one I had was too bright. Anyway, since my project is
finished and Matt has already gone over it I want to see if
all of you would be willing to give me some feedback on my
project. It is in our dropbox for all of you who want to check it
out.
Since my project is done with I
think it is only fair to share with you what my conclusions were. Let me catch
you all up with what my purpose for this project was, summarize all my results
and inform you what my conclusion is.
For starters the purpose for my
project was to test a variety of extraction kits and protocols that would
determine the most efficient method for running PCR.
I tested three different
extraction kits;
- Epicentre: QuickExtract Bacteria DNA Extraction,
- Protocol Isolation and Purification of total genomic DNA
- Sigma: GenElute Bacteria Genomic DNA Kit
I tested different bacteria with
each kit;
- AgroBacterium (gram-negative)
- Bacillus subtilis (gram-positive)
- Escherichia coli (gram-negative)
- Salmonella (gram-negative)
- Staphylococcus aureus (gram-positive)
- Staphylococcus epidermidis (gram-positive)
Bacteria
|
Epicentre
|
Sigma Extractions
|
Isolation and Purification of genomic DNA
Extractions
|
PCR Results
|
|
AgroBacterium tumefaciens
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
Positive
|
|
Bacillus subtilis
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
Negative
|
Positive
|
|
Escherichi coli
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
Positive
|
|
Salmonella
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
Negative
|
Negative
|
|
Staphylococcus aureus
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
Negative
|
Positive
|
|
Staphylococcus epidermidis
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
Negative
|
Negative
|
|
The table you see is the same table I included in my poster, this table shows which kits and protocols worked for each bacteria and the last column shows which bacteria had positive results after running PCR on them. If you can see the protocol that had the least amount of successful extractions was the Isolation and Purification of genomic DNA, while Epicentre had the most successful extractions and the Sigma worked for the gram-negative bacteria.
No comments:
Post a Comment